Here are some posts from the Arkansas board.
Mike,
Lynn Hicks now owns and runs Supreme Boats. You can configure the boat however you like. Don't know a damn thing about the jets except that I hate them.....
Jimmy T.
Grumpy
Member
Posts: 124
(10/21/06 5:24 am)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey JT, How ya been doing & when did Al give up the reigns of Supreme, i kinda liked the 'ol fart
Grumpy
Jimmy T
Moderator
Posts: 3562
(10/21/06 6:10 pm)
Reply
Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1st but Al still comes in in the mornings and plays conductor. Good to see ya Grumpy. One day we will meet and get to fish together.......
Jimmy T.
Grumpy
Member
Posts: 125
(10/22/06 4:45 am)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yep, one of these days, it'll be a blast.
Grumpy
David Bolin
Member
Posts: 13
(10/22/06 9:19 pm)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike,
I have a 2000 series with with a jet. The boat first then, then the jet... The 2000 is perfect for low water fishing on the Little Red. It's very stable and requires very little water to clear the shoals when plained out (4 to 8 inches depending on how much weight I'm carrying). The only down side is sucking leaves into the jet in the fall. If the river is covered with leaves, might as well leave the boat at home. As I recall the 2070 is 6 inches wider and about an inch taller than my boat. Also the motor mounts in the middle of the transom. Otherwise the boats are functionally the same.
Now a few pros and cons on the jet. My 25/20 2 stroke Mercury is roughly the equivalent of a 15hp prop plained out. It's very sluggish out of the hole compared to a prop and louder. I have several friends running 25/20 2 strokes on 2070s. They push the 2070 about the same as my 2000 even though the 2070 is heavier. The additiional displacement of the 2070 seems to compensate for the additional weight. To fish the LR in low water, a prop is usless in the areas that I fish. There just isn't enough water in the shoals to get through them without banging up a prop. It's the jet or stay home.
I haven't run a Supreme with a Yahama 4 stroke 40/30, but I've seen several of them on 2070s this fall. They are quiet compared to mine. They probably make less noise than the 2 cycle props running wide open. There have been other 40 and 50 jets on the river that are extremely loud. Sounds like a tractor pull when they run them wide open. I've see guides wearing ear protection running those motors. Hopefully common sense will eventually prevail in those cases...get a reasonably quiet motor. The 40/30 seems to get up on top of the water much faster than my boat. It's probably comparable to a 25hp prop.
A jet is significantly less responsive than an equivalent prop at low speeds. I spent several hours in Jimmy Ts boat a couple weeks ago. He can run his prop through the shoals on the White at very low speeds like a well tuned sports car. You can't do that with a jet. He can push his boat up into a shoal (where there's enough water to keep the prop out of the rocks), put it in casting positon and drop the anchor very efficiently. I could do the same thing with my jet, but their wouldn't be any fish there to cast to by the time I blew a jet wash across them a couple times trying to get into position. What I can do with my jet is plane out the boat and fly across that same shoal in a matter of seconds. I just can't ease through it looking for fish. I use the jet to get to a start point on the river and then use a trolling motor to positon the boat in a long drift (a mile or two).
I use a remote control trolling motor so it can be controlled from anywhere in the boat. I modified the lock down on the trolling motor to be able to release it in the down positon to drift across shallow shoals backwards (transom first). I still have sideways control and the motor just bounces up if it bumps a rock in the shoal. I just lock it back down as soon as the trolling motor will clear all the rocks. So instead of easing up into a shoal with a prop, I back through it with a trolling motor.
Hope that helps,
David
Davyfly
Norfork Moderator
Posts: 652
(10/23/06 6:49 am)
Reply
ezSupporter
Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike.
Boats. l own 2 a Shawnee and a custom JS.
Wide bottomed boats are way more stable than the narrow versions for sure. 48ins.
Many things are a consideration, at least from a guiding point of view.
Weight of clients, number of persons in the boat, how does that boat track on drift lines, ease of movement and so on.
How doe'sthat boat perform when dealing with both high and high water flows etc.
Jets, same as Jimmy, l hate them, for most of the reasons that Dave wrote.
There are very few places l cannot navigate on the White river when it is low, the few l cannot, at least up stream really do's not matter. You can also run a shuttle if need be, which would be a rare thing for me to do.
In the worst case you can always get out and pull the boat up stream.
Props have way more advantage when you are working with adverse wind and have to correct with small spurts boat position, they simply allow for very fast action of navigation and position of your boat.
You will be surprised when you know how, run a prop in very shallow water and navigate around very small chutes that you have to work with.
Just got to know the river in that case.
I have 3 motors, a 10 hp for the Buffalo, as that is the regs there. A 15 which l use most of the time and a 25 for high water, that really does move a boat along, but l dislike it for working on very shallow water, ok for down stream runs but not always the best for running up shallow water shoals etc.
If the 4 stroke motors had the same shallow water drive as the 2st -15 l would buy one but they do not, the 10hp does.
Other downside for the 4s is weight factor, makes no difference for good water levels but it does when running low water.
I borrowed one , and could see a very big difference with it compared to my 2s-15
I am not familiar with your river Mike so you would also have to take that into consideration.
Down stream floats is one thing, having to run up stream when you have low water is another.
Mike a friend of mine won a new Supream boat, l understand that he intends to sell it as he already has a new Shawnee.
I can give you his contact number if you like.
Davy.
Mike Anderson
Member
Posts: 3
(10/24/06 7:50 am)
Reply | Edit Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the comments everyone!
I am very experienced with navigating a tiller through skinny water, I’ve been doing it for many years. I also owned several different hull configurations including glass and aluminum. However, I’m getting tired of pulling my boat up fast and long shoals. I'm worn out by the time I get to where I want to fish. If I’m drifting I’ll be using my remote control trolling motor not the outboard so slow speed control is not a real big issue with me. Typically I like to run way up and float back down, or float down and wait for the water to hit so I can get back up. The jet affords me to start back up as soon as I see the first sign of generation. I don’t intend to run on plane across shallow shoals where waders are fishing, period! I will only use my jet where it won’t ruin the fishing for others.

??
How well do the boats track since they don’t’ have a keel of any kind?
Does the trolling motor operate well mounted where the mount is on the new Supremes (not centered)?
How well does the bottom hold up being dragged across gravel bars? Are the bottoms good and solid on these boats?
What about AFF boats? I have seen a few of them and they look pretty good and are wider as well. I think the guy who builds them is hard to get in contact with.
Davy
Where can I find a Picture of a Shawnee? Are those the green boats that Gastons uses?
Yes I would like the contact info of the guy who has a Supreme for sale.
Thanks again
Mike Anderson
David Bolin
Member
Posts: 18
(10/24/06 6:43 pm)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tracking: I can't get up enough speed with my 25/20 to worry about tracking. The 40/30 might be a different story.
Trolling motor mount: Works fine for me mounted on one side. You wouldn't have a platform to stand on if it was mounted in the middle. I wish I didn't need the thing at all. I any accessory that might snag a fly line or cause someone to fall out of the boat. I'd eliminate the seats, trolling motor, the strap on the rear storage compartment and the outboard motor if I could to have a snag free casting platform. Hmm...sounds like a drift boat. I'll keep the trolling motor for now.
Bottom: Mine is scratched up after 5 years of hard running. I fill any exposed fiberglass fibers in those scratches with epoxy. The bottom did in the middle just behind the live wells. That was caused by high centering on rocks and rocking it off (not a very bright idea). I patched it with a fiberglass kit from Lowes. No permanent damage. The bottom should last a lifetime with proper use and repair.
David
Davyfly
Norfork Moderator
Posts: 658
(10/25/06 6:02 am)
Reply
ezSupporter
Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike,
AFF boats are not produced now days, they are some what large and very heavy compared to the regular boats we use here.
Wear and tear. I run about 200 plus days a year or more on the rivers here.
And in the case of dealing with fly fishing clients you are often working in shallow water zones.
You will suffer wear and tear there is no doubt if that one, and if we have low water flows that of course adds to that.
Dragging the boat across gravel bars, not something l care to do to be honest, that is hard work.
I did that one time on the Norfork, from the dam to the confluence, never again, but it was the only way l would know myself the worth of that one.
Found that one out in a hurry, not a option.
If you have enough water under the boat to float it no problem.
You will after time wear much of the gel coat off at certain points. and probably also have some deeper damage to the hull.
About every two years l will turn my boats over, and do what is needed to re-build the loss of gel coat and the places that have obvious wear down.
You need to have that boat inside to do that, or at least wait till we have days of at least 65f or more, first to make sure that the hull is 100% dry and also so the curing process takes place. Must have the boat turned up side down as it is very difficult to make a real neat job otherwise.
More or less l will sand down the entire botton. Re-fill any large scrapes and scratches.
I use a number of flberglass products that build back strength, not just a epoxy mix as such.
Once that is all done, again the whole deal is sanded down before the final gel coat is applied.
Looks like new again.
The outer edges of the hull often see damage from rock structure, here l add a reinforcment along the leading edges.
Fact l do some boat repair work for others when l have the time.
Hulls are produced different ways, depending on the manufacturer. The shape is one thing and also how they flex is another.
The Shawnee co use cedar strips and a solid glass structure others differ with a two layer system.
This is also one further reason why l do noy like jets as you are more likely to hit structure at faster speeds, you would not run a prop fast in zone that you know you are likely to hit the prop.
I know of two persons here on the White who tore holes in the hull from running fast with jets over shallow shoals.
Accept wear and tear as a given Mike if you are going to use that boat on a regular basis over shallow bottoms.
DW
Mike Anderson
Member
Posts: 4
(10/26/06 5:55 am)
Reply | Edit Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am down to two choices one is an aluminum jon boat, the other a Supreme or similar glass boat. Would someone explain why most of the boats on the White are Glass. I would think the bottom of an aluminum boat would withstand the dragging, etc, better then glass. I've been through several boats the last few years and I am trying to avoid buying the wrong boat again. The rivers I fish for the most part are exactly like the White.
Thanks everyone you've been a great help!!!!
Mike
Grumpy
Member
Posts: 126
(10/26/06 6:14 am)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man, i wish i never had sold mine.
Mike you know the answer, glass slides, aluminum sticks.
Grumpy
Davyfly
Norfork Moderator
Posts: 665
(10/26/06 4:42 pm)
Reply
ezSupporter
Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike,
Glass is easy to repair, AL you got to get it welded.
They do not make ally boats in the same profile as the glass boats we use.
And they do not have the same type of flat bottomed hull, if so l have never see one as yet l would use here.
My boats are 21ft in length.
Can accomodate 2 persons fly fishing easy, and 3 if they take care when casting.
Davy
stinnetti
Member
Posts: 590
(10/26/06 7:16 pm)
Reply Re: First post! Question about Supreme Boats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike,
Consider a drift boat ! I certainly reccomend them, not real fast but a great boat to fish out of. By the way I do have a motor on mine.
But if I were going to buy a jon boat for the White it would be a 20' Supreme w/ a 15hp merc
Steve
Springcreekoutfitter.net