Author Topic: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??  (Read 17377 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

grumpy

  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Karma: +21/-5
    • ctflyfishingforum
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2009, 07:12:38 AM »
Keith

You'll get more HP out of a 2 stroke motor, you could use a 20 & still have more power than a 25 4 stroke, the 2 stroke will also get you out of the hole quicker & be a lot lighter.
Then, there's that oil mixing deal & a lil more noise with the 2 stroke :( i always hated that.

Grumpy

David L. Darnell

  • FishHead
  • *****
  • Posts: 1706
  • Karma: +13/-1
  • Insane Trout Bum
    • my site
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2009, 09:31:48 AM »
Gentleman,

Gheenoe's are a great little boat. A two person boat in my experience and opinion.

Great design, with an almost cult following, here is the place to go for Gheenoe questions and opinions. http://www.customgheenoe.com/forum/

I'd stick with a 15hp 4 stroke. Check with RedDog for a ride in his Classic with a 15 Honda on it. She travels 18mph with us two upstream against one generator, not bad ;)

There is not a perfect boat or setup, you can get close but not one boat that will do it all.

If the LT25 had of handled the jet motor like they will a prop motor, it would still be out in my garage and I'd not be rigging the new Tracker modified-V I replaced it with.

To give you an idea, the people pushing a LT with a prop motor, jack plate and trim tabs, are getting 30+mph. I got a streaking blink you eyes of 12mph with the jet :o


bd

  • *****
  • Posts: 2003
  • Karma: +6/-8
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2009, 12:57:49 PM »
That's awful!  I don't understand why there's such a big dropoff in mph with a jet.   ???

bd

Glenn Hawkins

  • FishHead
  • *****
  • Posts: 1273
  • Karma: +4/-0
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2009, 03:22:09 PM »
The weight of David's motor combinded with a lack of enough transom width. 

When a jet motor goes from an idle to wide open. Where you will find you operate it most of the time.  It is like a vaccum.  It sucks down the rear of the boat.  If the transom and bottom surface area are not wide enough the boat will never plane out fully.  Unless, you have a bunch more of horse power.  20-25hp just won't do it on a Gheenoe/Riverhawk.

Leo deMonbreun

  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • Karma: +11/-5
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2009, 06:08:42 PM »
The weight of David's motor combinded with a lack of enough transom width. 

When a jet motor goes from an idle to wide open. Where you will find you operate it most of the time.  It is like a vaccum.  It sucks down the rear of the boat.  If the transom and bottom surface area are not wide enough the boat will never plane out fully.  Unless, you have a bunch more of horse power.  20-25hp just won't do it on a Gheenoe/Riverhawk.

man, that just sucks!! 
"For the supreme test of a fisherman is not how many fish he has caught, not even how he has caught them, but what he has caught when he has caught no fish." - John H. Bradley

bd

  • *****
  • Posts: 2003
  • Karma: +6/-8
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #20 on: March 17, 2009, 11:05:06 AM »
Hmm.  Well, I guess I'm glad I got this information.  You gentlemen just saved me $3,000.00.  :)

I definitely would have been putting a jet on the Gheenoe at some point before I read this.  Now I'll have to reconsider.

I guess the next step is to evaluate what I can do to run my prop drive motor shallower.  If I could get it to run in 12" or so, I'd put one of those Mac's River Runners on it to protect the prop and I'd be happy.  Needing 2 ft to 2.5 ft of water to run without hitting rock is not satisfactory.

bd

David L. Darnell

  • FishHead
  • *****
  • Posts: 1706
  • Karma: +13/-1
  • Insane Trout Bum
    • my site
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #21 on: March 17, 2009, 09:10:37 PM »
BD,

Go over to the Gheenoe board and ask questions, with the understanding that most of them have never seen good running water  ;D, most are coastal and inshore users.

But, you will get some ideas.

I'd look into jack plate, large adjustable trim tabs.

Steve H

  • Need to fish!
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9491
  • Karma: +999/-5
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2009, 12:20:29 PM »
BD, here is the jack plate I put on my boat. Tons of adjustability and super light as well it is easy to mount and you can even adjust it on the water if need be. Mind you, not hydraulic but I didn't see the need for that plus I didn't want the extra weight.


http://www.bobsmachine.com/  - Navigate to the Convertible Jack Plate
Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

bd

  • *****
  • Posts: 2003
  • Karma: +6/-8
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #23 on: March 20, 2009, 11:41:57 AM »
Thanks, Steve.  A jack plate is going on my "I want" list.  I don't think I'm interested in a hydraulic - too much $ (even if it's still 1/3 the price of a jet).  A convertible or manual jack plate might be a good compromise between a fixed plate and a hydraulic.

bd

Leo deMonbreun

  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • Karma: +11/-5
Re: Line-X on the bottom of a boat ??
« Reply #24 on: March 20, 2009, 09:57:25 PM »
"For the supreme test of a fisherman is not how many fish he has caught, not even how he has caught them, but what he has caught when he has caught no fish." - John H. Bradley