Jim Mauries at Fly South loaned me a Scientific Angler Mastery Streamer Express 250-grain integrated fly line to try out and see how I liked it. I tried it out side by side with my Orvis Depth Charge at Priest Sat and felt obliged to post the results (eat my words…).
When I removed it from the box it didn’t feel as solid as my Orvis and I noticed it had a mono core. Hmm, I can see right now I’m not going like this stuff I told a buddy. I’m pretty loyal to the Orvis DC line.
I strung it up on my new Cabelas FT 11’ 6wt just to see how the rod performed with 250 more then anything (it was sweeet btw). I striped out most of the running line and started casting. The intermediate running line has a smaller dia. then the Orvis, that’s kind of nice. I immediately noticed how slick this stuff is as it slid in and out of the guides on the false casts. Then when I let it go it took off like it’d been fired out of a gun pulling most of the running line off the boat floor. It stretched all the way out and flipped the tippet over laying my fly at the end of the cast. Ok it has to be the rod I thought so I put it on my Xi 9’ 7wt and it still performed like a dream.
The more I fished it the more I liked it. It sinks fast, it’s slicker then owl poo, shoots like no sinking line I’ve ever cast and lays out nice and flat, not as prone to dumping at the end.
I took the reel off the Xi and replaced it with another reel with Orvis DC and the difference was noticeable right away. My buddy even said I was getting further with the other line. It didn’t take me long to go back to the SA and I stayed with it the rest of the trip.
Since it’s a mono core and it was getting cold I was expecting it to coil up in a big nasty ball but it did pretty good. As the weather got colder the line started to stiffen up pretty good and tangles did become a bit of a problem. This is a problem with the Orvis line as well but it’s too soon to say if one is any worse then the other yet.
Another concern I had with Mono core lines is that the outer coating can slip off the mono core more easily then a braided core in IMO. This is easily fixed by using an Albright to connect to the backing and tying and whip finishing a loop on the sinking end (like the welded loops), or just using the Castwell knot if your in a hurry like I was.
Durability is where the Orvis line shines. You can beat it, drag it, break off 20 pound tippet, stand on it, give it to clients to use, and abuse the hell out of it and it holds up exceptionally well. I have some that has sustained three years of abuse and is still in use. Its to soon to say if the SA can take the abuse that the DC line can but I’m not gonna cut it any slack. It’ll go through the same torture test the Orvis has and we’ll see if it holds up. I think it will.
My initial impression is that this line casts better then the Orvis hands down. It’s slicker and sinks faster (smaller dia.) and just feels better casting then the Orvis. There, I said it.
