Author Topic: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill  (Read 2703 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

toddro

  • Lodgers
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
  • Karma: +1/-0
Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« on: July 03, 2011, 10:52:42 AM »
 >:( >:( >:(

LAUREL, Mont. (AP) — Hundreds of barrels of crude oil spilled into Montana's Yellowstone River after an ExxonMobil pipeline beneath the riverbed ruptured, sending a plume 25 miles downstream and forcing temporary evacuations, officials said.
The break near Billings in south-central Montana fouled the riverbank and forced municipalities and irrigation districts Saturday to close intakes.
The river has no dams on its way to its confluence with the Missouri River just across the Montana border in North Dakota. It was unclear how far the plume might travel.
Cleanup crews deployed booms and absorbent material as the plume moved downstream at an estimated 5 to 7 mph.
"The parties responsible will restore the Yellowstone River," Mont. Gov. Brian Schweitzer said.
A 600-foot-long black smear of oil coated Jim Swanson's riverfront property just downstream from where the pipe broke.
"Whosever pipeline it is better be knocking on my door soon and explaining how they're going to clean it up," Swanson said as globules of oil bubbled to the surface. "They say they've got it capped off. I'm not so sure."
ExxonMobil spokeswoman Pam Malek said the pipe leaked an estimated 750 to 1,000 barrels of oil for about a half-hour before it was shut down. Other Exxon officials had estimated up to 42,000 gallons of crude oil escaped.
Duane Winslow, Yellowstone County director of disaster and emergency services, said the plume was dissipating as it moved downstream. "We're just kind of waiting for it to move on down while Exxon is trying to figure out how to corral this monster," Winslow said.
"The timing couldn't be worse," said Steve Knecht, chief of operations for Montana Disaster and Emergency Services, who added that the plume was measured at 25 miles near Pompeys Pillar National Monument. "With the Yellowstone running at flood stage and all the debris, it makes it dang tough to get out there to do anything."
Brent Peters, the fire chief for the city of Laurel about 12 miles west of Billings, said the rupture in the 12-inch diameter pipe occurred late Friday about a mile south of Laurel.
He said about 140 people in the Laurel area were evacuated early Saturday due to concerns about possible explosions and the overpowering fumes. He said they were allowed to return at about 4 a.m. after fumes had decreased.
Winslow said hundreds of residents downstream were told to evacuate in the early morning hours as authorities knocked on doors, but it's unclear how many did.
In a statement, ExxonMobil said it was sending a team to help with cleanup, and that state and federal authorities had been alerted to the spill. The ExxonMobil Pipeline Company "deeply regrets this release," it said.
Crews were putting out absorbent material along stretches of the river in Billings and near Laurel, but there were no attempts at capturing oil farther out in the river. In some areas oil flowed underneath booms and continued downstream.
The smell of oil permeated the air for miles downstream and through the city of Billings.
"Nobody's been able to lay their eyes on the pipe," Peters said. "Right now, the Yellowstone River is at flood stage. The bank isn't stable enough for anybody to get close."
The cause of the rupture in the pipe carrying crude oil from Belfry, Mont., to the company's refinery in Billings wasn't known. Peters and Malek said speculation involves high water that might have gouged out the river bed and exposed the pipe, which was possibly hit by debris.
"I haven't seen it this high for at least 15 years," Peters said.
Jeb Montgomery of ExxonMobil said the pipe was buried six feet below the riverbed.
The state has received record rainfall in the last month and also has a huge snowpack in the mountains that is melting, which has resulted in widespread flooding in recent weeks.
Three oil refineries are in the Billings area, and Peters said he asked all three to turn off the flow of oil in their pipelines under the river once the leak was reported. He said ExxonMobil and Cenex Harvest Refinery did so, and that Conoco Phillips said its pipe was already shut down.
He said the river where the leak occurred is about 250 yards wide, and that an oil slick appeared to be about 20 feet wide.
"That was the farthest my flashlight would reach," he said.
Laurel, which has about 6,500 residents, is known for a huge Fourth of July fireworks display put on by the fire department. Peters said the town can swell to as many as 50,000 people for the event.
He said the fire department plans to hold the event on Monday.
"A passion for steelhead is a hard ride. It is all consuming. God help the woman, man, or child who hopes to compete for some small claim to the passion in the angler so stricken." Bill McMillan, Foreword- A Passion for Steelhead

Curtis Martin

  • *****
  • Posts: 617
  • Karma: +23/-12
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2011, 11:44:37 AM »
Quote
Duane Winslow, Yellowstone County director of disaster and emergency services, said the plume was dissipating as it moved downstream. "We're just kind of waiting for it to move on down while Exxon is trying to figure out how to corral this monster," Winslow said.


That's the best they can come up with? From Exxon in Alaska, BP in the Gulf, to Exxon in Yellowstone, you would think they would have some experience at cleaning this stuff up. I don't know how much more of this we can tolerate; environmentally or at the pump?

Curtis

toddro

  • Lodgers
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2011, 03:26:30 PM »
If this had happened above Billings, it would have generated a much more urgent response.  The Yellowstone below Billings does not have the same allure and prestige as the higher river.  That being said, I agree - this is their best strategy?  "Trying to figure out to control this monster"?  Where is the disaster response plan and why is not being implemented?
"A passion for steelhead is a hard ride. It is all consuming. God help the woman, man, or child who hopes to compete for some small claim to the passion in the angler so stricken." Bill McMillan, Foreword- A Passion for Steelhead

grumpy

  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Karma: +21/-5
    • ctflyfishingforum
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2011, 09:52:42 PM »
Where is the disaster response plan and why is not being implemented?

You can't stop Mother Nature, unfortunately.

Grumpy

Steve H

  • Need to fish!
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9491
  • Karma: +999/-5
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2011, 06:35:44 AM »
Grumpy, while I do agree, one would think that they (meaning Exxon) would have a disaster response plan that included a scenario such as this and how to best contain the spill.
Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

grumpy

  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Karma: +21/-5
    • ctflyfishingforum
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2011, 07:11:20 AM »
BP, was a prime example of "oh shit" what do we do now, i really don't think they look far into those "it's a million to one" odds.

Grumpy

icthus

  • FishHead
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
  • Karma: +2/-0
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2011, 09:03:55 AM »
Another excuse for the big oil companies to charge $4.00 a gallon.

Yipppeee!!!!!
Happy 4th,
Pal
"You see the fish, make the cast. Tic, tic, hit him, no not a trout set!!!!!! What are you doing?"

toddro

  • Lodgers
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2011, 04:33:11 PM »
Boy does this all sound familiar:

- the oil leak is now bigger than was initially reported.

- the oil damage is more widespread than initially reported, and is leaking into backwater areas and even up into some smaller tributaries.

- the pipeline was closed in May on fears it could break if The Yellowstone were to get near floodstage.  After "testing", it was deemed safe and reopened, only to break when The Yellowstone got near floodstage.

I can't believe this is not bigger news than it is.  I have a friend who is fishing in Yellowstone right now.  I txt'd him to ask him what was being said up there and what some of the news reports were from that area.  He knew nothing about.  Very few fishing sites that I read are reporting it either...

Updates:
http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/article_2b84f0e5-a31a-59b8-aeca-c24581dd4de1.html?oCampaign=hottopics
"A passion for steelhead is a hard ride. It is all consuming. God help the woman, man, or child who hopes to compete for some small claim to the passion in the angler so stricken." Bill McMillan, Foreword- A Passion for Steelhead

bd

  • *****
  • Posts: 2003
  • Karma: +6/-8
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2011, 08:35:28 PM »
You can't stop Mother Nature, unfortunately.

Mother Nature ain't the problem, it's the oil companies dumping shit all over Mother Nature that's the problem.  :)

bd

toddro

  • Lodgers
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Exxon Strikes Again - Yellowstone Oil Spill
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2011, 02:35:43 PM »
There are so many parallels to this spill and the BP spill.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2011/07/09/montana-gov-exxon-misled-us.html?om_rid=Nsft$J&om_mid=_BOGKxYB8cRt76W

It seems Exxon has lied about how long it took to close off the ruptured pipe, lied about the extent of the spill, and refused to share documents with the state.
"A passion for steelhead is a hard ride. It is all consuming. God help the woman, man, or child who hopes to compete for some small claim to the passion in the angler so stricken." Bill McMillan, Foreword- A Passion for Steelhead